Jim Stone, Freelance Journalist, re formatted for print on September 16 2013
The 3/11 earthquake, tsunami, and nuclear disaster did not occur naturally. In this report you will find all the evidence needed to support this claim and more.
This is a vital report because it documents the dawning of a new type of environmental warfare in which advanced technologies are used to make unsuspecting populations believe their destruction occurred by the will of nature, thus leaving the destroyers in a position to demand governments stay silent while they perform the job of destroying or enslaving their populations to the will of the global “elite”.
This environmental threat tactic, when coupled with industrial virus attacks and nuclear blackmail is the new direction the “elite” have chosen to take warfare now that false flag terror in the name of Arabs has failed to convince the world’s populations that massive hot wars are needed.
The key points this report covers to prove this tactic is in use are:
Reactor 3 is completely missing, which means the press and anyone who has claimed anything about pressures, temperatures, containment, etc. at reactor 3 after March 14 2011 is lying and people need to pay attention to it, because failure of the public to realize the massive extent of the lies about what is going on there will leave the door open to a repeat event.
Lies must be told to hide what really happened at Fukushima, because like false flag terror in the name of Arabs, once the secret about environmental terrorism and industrial warfare is known, it’s usefulness is minimized.
A missing reactor 3 proves the hydrogen explosion theory false, because all reactor engineers know that you cannot lose a reactor entirely absent having a massive explosion on the order of a nuclear weapon make it disappear. Yet reactor 3 is indeed blown to smithereens with the control rods and reactor guts laying out in the open in the outer containment structure, as shown in the photo below:
Here we have reactor 3’s guts laying out in the open, with the core spray system still trying to function. Notice all the dust mixed in with the debris, dust which could never have happened from a mere hydrogen blast.
A large portion of this dust is reactor core material as indicated by it’s color, and the rest is concrete.
It is important to know that it takes a detonation (supersonic explosion) to turn concrete into dust, and even under ideal conditions with a perfect oxygen/hydrogen mixture, an open air hydrogen ignition never achieves the shock wave speed of a detonation. The dust alone proves that something other than hydrogen did this.
Reactor 4 is Building 7, demolished by explosives. The biggest smoking gun proving the Fukushima disaster was in fact an act of war is the near mythically impossible destruction of Reactor 4, which exploded despite not having a core, as mysteriously as building 7 fell on 9/11 despite never being hit by a plane.
Reactor 4 had been defueled and was undergoing replacement of it’s internal stainless steel shroud, yet according to the official story blew it’s containment anyway.
That is the FINAL smoking gun, an empty reactor is inert and cannot produce an explosion, yet one happened at 4 that was so powerful it destroyed the structure which had a frame consisting of solid steel columns
12 feet thick, and solid concrete and rebar walls on that frame which were 4 feet thick, leaving it in danger of falling over.
There is nothing short of a small nuclear weapon that can blow a structure that strong to pieces, demolition charges will not do it absent occupying much of the interior space which would have been obvious to workers.
Unlike what some people have theorized, that the hydrogen came from the fuel pool, overheated open fuel pools cannot produce hydrogen because in an open fuel pool the water boils off at 100 Celsius, and the hydrogen producing scenario requires water to be in pressurized form at 2,000 degrees Celsius to liberate it’s hydrogen by losing it’s oxygen to the zircon cladding in the fuel rods. The entire hydrogen story needs the right environment to happen, and that environment requires temperatures of 2000 degrees Celsius, saturated steam, and thousands of PSI inside a reactor to happen. This makes any explosion at reactor 4, which was wide open and disassembled flatly impossible.
Knowing reactor 4 could never have exploded because it was disassembled created a problem for the people fronting the environmental warfare scam. Since it was impossible for reactor 4 to explode while mothballed, a fact which would be easy for the public to grasp, an alternate explanation for the explosion at reactor 4 was hatched by none other than Arnie Gundersen, who claimed a “prompt criticality” occurred in the fuel pool, which supposedly went off like a nuclear weapon.
But that only flew with the most ignorant in the population, because a nuclear weapons style “prompt criticality” can happen only with nuclear material that is 70 percent enriched plutonium, or 90 percent enriched uranium, and THEN only when a high precision explosive charge brings that material together in a calculated way at supersonic speeds. Even if the fuel in the pool was 90 percent enriched, the racks it is in and lack of a nuclear trigger to bring it all together correctly would have prevented any prompt criticality. Nuclear detonations are hard to accomplish, they don’t happen by accident.
Reactor 4 had no core in it, and was undergoing replacement of it’s internal shroud. Many people said it was enriching plutonium because it blew up. This picture clearly shows-
You can look straight down the throat of the empty reactor. Something else blew this up. What did?
This is Fukushima’s building 7, which “collapsed” at the world trade center on 9/11 even though nothing hit it.
Reactor 4’s dome was removed for defueling. Drone photos prove it. This dispels the rumors surrounding unit 4’s explosion. Some people have said that this reactor was secretly in operation to enrich plutonium. This photo proves it was disassembled for shroud replacement as stated. Tepco is going out of it’s way trying to explain the explosions, especially at reactor 4 because they did indeed occur, so an explanation is needed. As a result they are giving reasons that cannot happen just to say something.
They need to see this report and get the Arava perspective(Arava is a district surrounding Dimona Israel).
Like building 7 on 9/11, if there ever was a way to prove Fukushima was an act of war and not an accident, reactor 4 is it.
This is the biggest smoking gun at Fukushima that can be used to wake people up.
You do not need to be any sort of expert to see that without a core, nothing can happen to a reactor other than willful destruction as an act of war. Attached to the end of this report is an additional article which shows that other nuclear facilities have been rigged to explode the way reactor 4 did, with an example in Sweden.
That the destruction of reactors 3 and 4 is so severe it could only have been accomplished with nuclear weapons. Hydrogen gas produces a non-ideal subsonic explosion. It cannot turn concrete into dust. It can produce high pressures if sealed off, but the metal roof on all the reactor containments should have provided the relief and been the only thing destroyed. It takes a high intensity explosive to strip concrete off rebar, a blast wave many times faster than supersonic. This means that whatever happened at Fukushima did not have blast characteristics that fit the “official” story. If you missed it in the high resolution photo of the destroyed facility, I took a car that was laying around in the remains and placed it on top of one of the blown away walls at reactor 3, which clearly gives the reference that the walls had support columns well over 12 feet thick.
Fukushima reactor 1 was assumed by many to have been built with the Mark 1 containment design, with the other reactors being mark 2, but Ripley, (the reactor engineer I interviewed, who designed unit 3) stated that the Japanese were insanely cautious with nuclear and had the facilities and safety systems built far beyond G.E. Specs. It is true that gas explosions can be very destructive, but only in facilities that were not designed to handle them.
Even the basic mark 1 containment lacking Japan’s upgrades was many times beyond capable of withstanding the worst hydrogen blast, and when you see in the referenced photos that the walls indeed had solid steel columns over 12 feet thick holding concrete 4 feet thick it makes this point obvious.
That nuclear weapon(s) were placed inside of the reactor containment(s) disguised as security cameras installed under contract the year of the disaster by Arava based security firm Magna BSP (Arava is a district around Dimona, not a city.) Their “security cameras” weighed over 1,000 pounds and were the size and shape of gun type nuclear weapons.
The reason Magna BSP gave for the odd shape, enormous weight, and giant proportions of their cameras was that they were stereoscopic. A stereoscopic camera could be plausible at an airstrip, where the camera would need depth perception out miles, but not indoors where focal lengths are short. The installation of one inside the inner containment of reactor 3 cannot be justified. Depth perception going out miles could also be accomplished with two separately mounted cameras weighing only a few pounds; the giant thousand pounder is a dead giveaway. Why this giant thing, when smaller nukes are possible? Nuclear weapons always produce a certain amount of heat, and if a small design was used it would be obvious the “camera” was warm, even when turned off and sitting on the shelf. This would cause questions to be asked, especially in a nuclear power facility. The enormous size and weight helped conceal the decay heat.
. . . . . . . . . .9/11, 4/11, 3/11? see a pattern? Let’s not see another X/11. Your time and effort in spreading the word may really make a difference.
The quake was not what we were told.
In fact, the quake was a bold faced lie, packing a political agenda. The proof goes beyond the linked Japanese chart. Please note – the date listed at the top of the charts linked at the end of this report (which contains ALL the seismic data from all reporting stations for the entire 3/11 earthquake) is the date of compilation, Japan has thousands of seismic stations run by numerous organizations, and they take time to merge into one final report. That is the date listed at the top of the linked compilation (March 15), and there is a shill out there who can’t figure this out, a fact which should be obvious because the main seismogram in this report is dated and timed to the quake, and is a match for the lower resolution seismograms in this large compilation.
The online Fukushima report shows a video of what happened in the NHK newsroom during the quake. A few files fell over, the laser printer which was not secured stayed on its shelf, and people kept typing at their keyboards. If the quake was as represented in this chart, people would have been thrown upwards at 3 g’s of acceleration, which would have thrown them to the ceiling, and would have been thrown towards the back of the room at the same time at 2 g’s of acceleration, smashing all of them and everything else in the room against the back wall. There is a reason why this “9.0” quake killed no one inland from the tsunami, and it is because it simply did not happen.
The following chart is from station MYG012, which is less than 1/2 mile from the NHK newsroom. The NHK news room video, which was shot within half a kilometer of the seismic station Erol Kalkan used to produce this chart PROVES THE USGS LIED. THERE WAS NO 9.0
The USGS charts are phony folks, that’s all there is to it! Scroll down to the video of the quake represented in the above chart, which represents a 9.0 and was reportedly from a seismic station only one half mile away from where the video was shot.
The implications of this run deep. The seismic chart, in conjunction with the
news room video, proves that the US government is also involved in the lie about the quake at some level. (this video is linked at the end of this report as it was functioning at the time of publication.) Since the video gets censored and deleted repeatedly from you tube because it proves the accuracy of this report, you might have to hunt for it.
Also, note that most of the stuff stays on the desks, at the end, a laser printer is still sitting on a cheap table, ect. some things fall but things return to normal quickly, all the while the English announcer is reading a script of devastation with all the pep of some paid fool who does not believe what he is saying in a cheezy infomercial. The quake was significant, but only in a 6.0 sense, as recorded by the JAPANESE seismographs, and FAKED to a 9.0 by the USGS. This is important footage, because it proves the earthquake measured at a 6.8 was an instrumentation based richter reading. Confusion between the Shindo and Richter scale is being used to cover this up .
Remember that this video is proof of what really went on. This means there never were significant aftershocks, never was a natural tsunami, and if they lied about that, what else? This video is pivotal and vital to exposing the truth. I chose this video because the news room is within eyeshot of station MYG012, which was used by the USGS to make these graphs which represent an 8.8 AT THAT STATION, as was stated in this (English) newscast and was probably used as a guide to fudge the lie due to the closeness of the newsroom to the seismic station. The full USGS assessment of the Japan quake is in the appendix to this printed report. Of course, they offer no reading from MYG011, which was closest to the 9.0 “epicenter” by a long shot, because it only got a 5.63’s worth of shaking. The map which confirms this is later in this report.
E-mails From Japan show the quake was not what we were told-
Readers in Japan are WELL AWARE the quake was not a 9.0 and the tsunami was artificial . I received mails like this for a total of about two days before they were censored. Some of these messages are from the same people sending updates.
My comments are in italics writers comments are in bold
Initial quake was reported as a 7.2, epicenter in/near Tohoku — this is what Japanese on the street were reading on their cell phones just after the event, this was Richter. Within 24 hours the magnitude was increased to 8.8, 8.9, 9.0….and, it seemed the epicenter was under debate.
My comment:
The first magnitude and epicenter are calculated by computer. These are in fact always correct, unless there is a political need to move the “epicenter” and increase the magnitude, in this case by about 100X and 85 miles. .
.
“Real-time video of the tsunami was playing in railway stations and other public locations….gave the whole thing a ‘HOLLYWOOD’ quality…surreal!!!”
My response:
The only way for real time video to happen was if they knew the event was going to happen, another smoking gun!
Another ODD thing….this on NHK…and right after the quake…a very studious piece about HOW the Tohoku Quake differed from Kobe…many doctors, emergency workers interviewed…and they were perplexed because it seems that recent earthquake protocols had been based on the Kobe disaster and all of these people were prepared to treat certain kinds of injuries, like what happens when victims are crushed… the doctors on the show remarked that the only injuries they were seeing had do do with the tsunami…e.g. immersion in water, near drowning, hypothermia…from immersion in water….they were NOT treating classic EQ injuries.
My response:
No traditional earthquake injuries equals no traditional earthquake, PERIOD
One more thing…the Japanese talked A LOT about the dimension of the tsunami…and, actually, witnesses/survivors from Fukushima said there were SEVEN tsunami, not one…just rolling one after another.
My response:
This gives credence to those who claim more than one nuke was used, a possibility I ignored entirely
Well, the size of these things in certain places was 39 meters, measured by large boats sitting on top buildings or land masses. What produces waves of this height? You are right on in your observation that there was little damage to wood/stucco homes…these things are built to fall down…they didn’t… You are absolutely right in pointing this out.
My response:
First of all, a measurement of a tsunami based upon where a large boat ended up is far more accurate than any other measurement. The Tsunami was 115 feet in some areas
Second, wooden Japanes homes are not built to American standards because the attitude towards wood structures is that they are disposable.
They are cheaply made and intended to be torn down after 25 years. I have confirmed they are made out of wood. A 39 meter tsunami is 115 feet tall. A 115 foot tsunami would need an earthquake over a 9 to do it, yet no damage to even cheap homes, designed to be torn down after temporary use. A total inconsistency with the official story, and I never heard of the tsunami being that big. But the Japanese OUGHT TO KNOW, they were there!
Thank you for your hard work to get out the truth.
I asked one individual directly if they could confirm the rumors that the Israelis were ready ahead of time with relief efforts, with 300 trucks, and if they could confirm the rumors that the Israelis controlled all relief efforts. She said he noticed a strong Israeli presense, enough to appear “very interesting”, but could not confirm the other points
Israelis – A big medical team came with lots of equipment and went to north. They left those equipment as a gift for evacuees. I thought it was very interesting, so I remembered it. But I didn’t hear the 300 trucks story.
This following comment confirms my three seismograms, which show two quake events to the north (which she felt) and one to the south, which she did not feel. This is pretty good proof that the quake was indeed not natural. All 3 peak readings were blamed on the same phony “epicenter” by the usgs. For reference, see the seismograms in the Fukushima report.
The one- It lasted more than 5 minutes. I timed it, so it is not how I felt. According to the mass media, there were 3 big quakes happened at the same time. I felt at least 2 peaks.
There is the Iran question, but also, Japan has been making rapprochements toward China for several years. The Emperor is said to travel regularly to Beijing. I can think of LOTS of reasons the U.S. would not want a strong Sino/Japanese alliance. In truth, both countries are scared shitless about a U.S. default on debt. I can see why they would wish to consider how they might jointly respond to this.
My friends and I bet as to who will blow Israel off the map, and the smart money says China.
Now the story develops. Interesting stuff. “blowing Israel off the map” would be counterproductive, because it is merely a sock puppet of the Rothchilds. Ignore the puppet – look towards the banking district in the City of London. I would bet Israeli behavior would be a LOT better if someone was not pulling their strings.
My thanks to the people in Japan who sent me these mails, certainly there were more I never got.
It blows me away to think such hard work would be done to stop the dissemination of a truth so essential
I challenge ANYONE to send me pictures of this quake showing me devastation in an area not hit by the tsunami.
All we have, all the pictures are tsunami damage. Let’s see pictures of quake damage. The Kobe quake was a 6.9/7.2 depending on source. That makes this quake, at a 9.0 100X as powerful (as far as how it is felt) but new information I did not have before states that for every full magnitude the energy is increased by 32X, which would actually make the quake close to a thousand times as powerful. Sendai was near the epicenter, where station MYG012 was and would have been devastated if it really happened as stated by the USGS. Look at the following photos of the Kobe quake and try to find ONE THING SIMILAR in
SENDAI. Just try. They do not exist. Outside of the tsunami, the quake which supposedly hit Sendai with many times the power of the one in Kobe, did not destroy a single building there. Sendai was only 48 miles from the epicenter of this “9.0” which would have devastated everything in an area 1,000 miles across if it was real. All of Japan would be toast.
Images of the Kobe quake lay the scam bare, and prove a cold hard reality – even with excellent construction Japanese buildings will fall down during a serious earthquake, there was nothing magical about Japanese buildings that make them capable of surviving a 9.0 and the fact that nothing collapsed in Sendai proves the quake did not happen as stated by the USGS or zionist media. The only honesty came from the Japanese seismograms, which prove something is seriously amiss
in the political sphere – Japanese seismologists have posession of the records and reported the truth, yet even the Japanese media is not telling the truth to the Japanese people.
These photos of Kobe say it all. Why,with a quake well over 100 times as large did NOTHING collapse in Sendai? Answer: The quake as presented is a lie.
Try to find a photo of seismic damage in Sendai. I challenge you. Try to find it in any of the coastal cities, as little as 25 miles from the “epicenter”. I looked for 5 hours, and except for some tanks that fell at a brewery not a single one exists. No pictures of collapsed skyscrapers or high rises equals NO 9.0. You will not find a single skyscraper photo where the windows got broken either. You will find no downed power poles, no flipped over cars, no uprooted trees, no derailed trains (except for one the tsunami hit), and the road damage is typical of even a 5.0. You will not find pictures of a single damaged multi story building or even a structurally damaged wood framed house outside the tsunami zone. In Sendai the quake messed up grocery stores and kitchens and that really is about it.
The quake is a paper thin lie taped together by the undeserved trust of a gullible public. And the stories? The CIA did not hire a million people in 2010 for nothing. If there is evidence of a 9.0 SHOW ME. A 9.0 will devastate an area over 1,000 kilometers across.
That is how big a 9.0 is. The entire nation should be in ruins, especially judging from the damage the
6.9 Kobe quake did, and no where, no where outside the tsunami zone in the entire country is there a single damaged multi story building, a single collapsed bridge, a single structurally damaged wood framed house, or skyscraper. If a picture exists that can be definitively pinned to this quake, show me. The only collapsed structure in all of Japan was an old welfare shelter near station MYG004, the true epicenter.
Take a look at these frame captures, and ask a question – Why is no one trying to run? Why are the cars all just parked peacefully as the tsunami arrived? Why was there no warning? Why did the tsunami sirens only go off after the tsunami arrived? Could it be that the people and the governement had not felt a significant earthquake and did not measure one either? Question: Why are none of the roads packed with people trying to flee the approaching tsunami?Could it be that the people and government were not expecting one? Tsunami sirens blare only when it arrives, rather than 40 minutes before, which is how much warning they would have had if a real quake in the ocean had been detected.
Consider that. Parking lots full of cars, everyone at work, no one trying to leave. AMBUSH!!.
And now, I will say it like I knew it had to be. I believe the phony 9.0 story was used as seismic cover for a tsunami nuke, which produced the tsunami of a 9.0 when detonated in the Japan trench (where no earthquakes of significance happen) as punishment for Japan offering to enrich uranium for Iran. In this updated report it is now obvious years later that the Japanese government refused to bankrupt their economy with a huge banker bailout, and this quake and disaster was done as a punishment. Now they have buckled with a trillion dollar gift to the World Bank being made to “end world poverty”. The rest of the story, the concealment, is black ops.
Bet on it. In the tsunami videos, the tsunami rips through pristine and undamaged cities, where business as usual is obvious and the tsunami is an ambush; not 9.0 earthquake ravaged debris.
When people keep typing at their keyboards during the quake, it’s obviously not what we were told.
When reviewing the seismic data for the supposed 9.0, I knew there were instead 3 small simultaneous inland epicenters. This made me suspicious right from the start that the quake was artificially triggered and used as seismic cover for a tsunami bomb. But I needed a reason to believe an artificial quake could have been done. I suspected that either Japan was testing nukes and Israeli intelligence was onto it and used the tests as the “start of clock” for their operation, or Israel managed to smuggle nukes into lava tubes and tunnels far underground to trigger earthquakes and contain the blasts. So I was hunting for tunnels and lava tubes near each of the three epicenters, and wanted to find them before writing this into this report. As it turns out, I did not need to. A military briefing with Secretary of Defense William Cohen, dated all the way back to 1997 shows that even then, Cohen knew about EM weaponry that could trigger quakes and set off volcanoes.. I have ignored everything regarding this subject, I thought it was the realm of kooks. I thought EM weaponry would be effective in weather modification only, but I am not going to argue with the Secretary of Defense. There are obviously then, energy technologies which have never been publicized, such weaponry would need far more energy input than the electrical grid could provide. And the systems Cohen spoke of in 1997 would be outdated now.
Cohen stated: “Others are engaging even in an eco- type of terrorism whereby they can alter the climate, set off earthquakes, volcanoes remotely through the use of electromagnetic waves. So there are plenty of ingenious minds out there that are at work finding ways in which they can wreak terror upon other nations. It’s real, and that’s the reason why we have to intensify our efforts, and that’s why this is so important. – William S. Cohen, Secretary of Defense, April 28, 1997. Left unsaid by William Cohen is that such systems would be developed by Darpa and owned by America first!
I would expect with 14 years of advancement that these technologies could now trigger devastating earthquakes in non-seismic zones.
The following picture is the strongest reading for this quake on any seismogram anywhere in Japan. This was before the lie machine got running smoothly. Early on there were a few sputters and this REAL chart got out. As you can see on this chart, it was a 6.67 on the Richter scale, (not shindo scale, confirmed by PGA reference) This would fit in with NO structural damage in Sendai and the level of shaking in the video
This quake was initially assessed a 6.8, and the seismic data will show anyone the epicenter was inland, not at sea. Please note – the date listed at the top is the date of compilation, Japan has thousands
of seismic stations run by numerous organizations, and they take time to merge into one final report. That is the date listed at the top of this compilation (March 15), and there is a shill out there who can’t figure this out, a fact which should be obvious because the main seismograph in this report is dated and timed to the quake, and is a match for the lower resolution seismograms in this large compilation.; or should I instead say it should be obvious because not a single building fell! So it started a 6.8, then got upgraded to a 7.9, then got upgraded to an 8.4, then got upgraded to an 8.8, then got upgraded to a 9.0, and had the epicenter put out in the ocean. Now many are saying it was a 9.1 which would bump up MYG011’s number to 1200 from 1070, and it is all based on tsunami effects, not seismic data
One problem with people grasping how big a 9.0 is, is exponential charts which will hide how much energy is really being released behind confusing gradient marking. To answer the need for clarity, I got out the calculator and produced a chart which shows you how big a 9.0 is on a linear scale.
Confusion over how GIANT a 9.0 really is has helped the elite scammers enormously in their lie. There is simply no way much of anything will remain standing, yet as the tsunami rolls in . . . . . .
And now, I will bite. This is what I did not want to publish, but I know it has to be true. Call this creative journalism, because I never called Netenyahu, but here is the most rational conclusion I can draw, based on all info gathered so far including the original not faked seismic data.
I honestly believe Japan is being held a nuclear hostage. It all makes sense.
Japan offers to enrich uranium for Israel’s GREAT SATAN, Iran
1a. Updated information indicates that Japan was being held under threat to hand over trillions of yen to the World Bank, and refused. I now believe that this was the primary motivation behind why the quake was perpetrated and Fukushima was destroyed. The zionists wanted to prove to Japan just how dirty they would be if Japan did not pay a ransom so high it would effectively enslave the Japanese people, and shortly after the disaster Japan suddenly announced a huge payment to the World Bank to “end world poverty”. Out of the blue. Good people they are, those Japanese, to destroy their economic future with such a voluntary action.
Immediately, Israel sets up front companies masquerading as security companies, and one of them succeeds in getting a security contract at a Japanese nuclear facility.
4 months later the Dimona Dozen shows up, and under the cover of a security contract gets unlimited access to the heart of Fukushima. They plant the virus, install real cameras outside the facility, and functional poorly disguised nuke cameras inside the facility. In addition to this, they install an unauthorized data connection to allow control of all the guts of the facility via the virus. (they admitted to this connection, as discussed later on this page)
After installing Stuxnet and the nukes they scram
Israel waits for one of the many natural quakes in Japan to provide cover for a tsunami bomb, and they already have it at the bottom of the Japan trench. VLF communications are established with the bomb to penetrate the water. David in Dimona gets seismic reading from Japan. 6.67 in progress, BOOM. (new evidence shows the quake most likely was not natural)
Tsunami comes in, swamps stuxnet infected power plant, direct video feed from legitimate cameras security company installed gets to David via totally unauthorized channel, and David knows just when to cut the generators off. Others on the team do all they can to counteract measures taken by the employees at fukushima, who are unaware an attack is taking place and do not understand why everything is going crazy
Israeli Prime Minister calls Japan, and says TAKE THAT for offering help to Iran,
and ya know, there are FIVE MORE NUKES in the ocean off the coast of Japan, and we are going to set those off and destroy your coastal cities if you do not forget that 6.67, and say it was a 9 to cover for tsunami effects. AND NOW we are going to make your people DEMAND you move away from nuclear power so you can NEVER threaten us like that again. We are BLOWING UP FUKUSHIMA DIIACHI and you are going to go along with whatever story we tell you to. SO THERE!!
David and his pals close ALL valves to the reactors via the remote data link they admitted to installing, and put them full throttle, to melt them down while the virus keeps control room readouts displaying false info, like nothing is going on even though the place is coming apart. After enough mayhem ensues to provide plausibility, they set off planted nukes and blow the place sky high.
Though I have yet to work out the final details, I probably have enough to hang them because:
I got the real seismic data that proves beyond a doubt the quake is not what we were told and was in fact an inland 6.8, (calculated higher than the seismogram due to the triangulated true epicenter being a little higher) which would get noticed but not feared in quake ridden Japan.
Numerous referenced sources prove Stuxnet really was written by Israel
Japan really did offer to enrich uranium for Iran, and really did refuse to do a huge banker bailout. Israel has been documented to have attempted to destroy a reactor in Iran, and probably did. Japan contributing to Iran’s nuclear future would make them just as much an enemy to Israel as Iran, and not sucking up to a banker threat the way America did would cause the zionists to slate an economy the size of Japan’s for destruction. Israel would want them taken out. Now all the economic news coming out of Japan is over how bad their economy now is, when prior to the quake it was golden. No key manufacturing got destroyed by the quake, why suddenly POOF – economy down the toilet? It’s because of the enormous debt Japan now must pay the bankers to “end world poverty.” Why would a nation do that with their economy in the tank anyway?
It is documented that a team from Israel, with a history consisting only of working in Israeli defense, got unlimited access to a Japanese nuclear facility, which then went boom
Reactor 4 had been defueled and proven disassembled, and therefore no explosion there was possible. What should have happened at reactor 4, if anything at all? the fuel pools should have melted down and caught fire once the water boiled off from lack of recirculation AT Worst, and badly contaminated the containment structure, NOTHING ELSE. NO explosions, NOTHING ELSE. Reactor 4 is building 7, PERIOD. Why did an explosion there happen that was so severe it blew the outer containment walls (4 feet thick) and inner containment walls that were much thicker? Reactor 4 is reportedly now in danger of falling over. HOW?
The Japanese government is going along with the story of a scientifically proven false 9.0. There is a reason, and my guess is that Israel has made threats to wipe out Japanese coastal cities with additional tsunamis if the government of Japan speaks a word of what went on, there should be no reason for Japan to go along with this other than a continued threat.
Is it not interesting this “quake” reportedly happened at the bottom of the Japan trench, which does not produce significant earthquakes and would be perfect for hiding an atomic bomb blast?
If detonated at the bottom of the Japan trench, a nuke could create an empty underwater dome of completely displaced water six kilometers tall and twelve kilometers across without ever breaching the surface. That would produce an epic tsunami all the while surface effects remained for the most part
hidden. With absolutely no significant quake damage in Sendai, a very large (megaton range) sub sea nuclear detonation remains the best explanation for the tsunami.
Is the Department of Homeland Security trying to keep American industries (and nuclear facilities in the dark about Stuxnet? After Fukushima fell victim to unwary operators, I would think such a conference would be a TOP priority here! The genie is out of the bottle. It is a fact that the writers of Stuxnet intend to use it. So cancelling a well researched conference about the vulnerabilities of the Siemens SCADA system to Stuxnet in the name of “keeping hackers from getting info” seems to me like an effort to keep the threat alive. Ignore the fluff at the beginning, and read the “About TakeDownCon” summary near the bottom so you know what they actually cancelled rather than settle for the no-panic fluff at the beginning. This is SERIOUS.
The article about the virus attack on Fukushima follows.
The following section covers the Fukushima disaster from a technical perspective
Published April 29,2011
Fukushima was impossible. The swamping of the generators by the tsunami was irrelevant, because the real emergency backup systems are driven by steam from the reactors themselves and require no electricity at all to function. No electricity is needed to operate three separate emergency systems at each reactor, each of which will keep a reactor safe even if only one works. Interesting it is then that all 9 non electrical backup systems across the three fueled reactors failed. This is technically impossible outside of willful intent, and was likely the result of a Stuxnet virus attack.
Stuxnet was designed specifically to target Siemens SCADA controllers and is most effective at tampering with fluid control systems of the type that Fukushima used for emergency safety. The centrifuges it attacked in Iran were ideal. So are the fluid control systems at a nuclear facility. Oil refineries are equally at risk, Stuxnet is most dangerous when affecting a system which needs to control the flow of any liquid, be it hydraulic, for cooling, or combining chemicals. Stuxnet is documented to have been produced by the,by the Israeli defense forces for the purpose of destroying any industrial system that can be destroyed by improper fluid flow. The following articles which document the creation of Stuxnet can be downloaded in full by typing the URL’s embedded in the screen captures.
Stuxnet has two modes, random and administrative. It can be administered to optimize the damage and can also transmit setup information and industrial system information to a remote computer. Once installed on the host system via a flash drive it causes that system to violate it’s normal security protocols and internet administration becomes possible if a connection exists. Tampering is not visible on the control room readouts, because Stuxnet learns what “normal” looks like and keeps the temperature, pressure, and other readouts within normal limits so that the operators are oblivious to the destruction happening in secret.
Stuxnet appeared in Japan in June of 2010, shortly after Magna BSP arrived. Remote administration mode can be adjusted on demand to suit any need. No doubt the people at Fukushima sat there in idle mode thinking all was well until something screamed or went boom and at that point it would be too late to do anything other than cry.
I did not catch this in the original report, but I now believe Stuxnet was first tested in America.
I am a lifer in the types of control systems Fukushima and it’s clone, TVA owned Browns Ferry have. BOTH have been upgraded to modern Siemens controllers running the Supervisory Control And Data Acquisition (SCADA) system Stuxnet was designed to attack; upgrades are the norm in any major facility. On many blogs people say the controls were old and therefore Stuxnet immune; they are out of touch or have no knowledge of industrial control systems. I actually ferreted it out.
And now I will explain in detail why the problems before the explosions had to be sabotage
The diesel generators were not out in the open as we were led to believe, they were in fact located in the basements of the turbine buildings which were sealed off and never significantly flooded. One of them stayed running the entire time, but the electrical switch gear attached to it disconnected it for an unexplained reason which made it useless. Each of the backup generators at Fukushima were capable of running 14,000 households each, which means they had to be over ten megawatts each. It is obvious then that Fukushima was set up to survive on only ONE of 13 backup generators, and ONE did keep running. One would be many times larger than needed to run last ditch backup systems at all reactors, but would not keep business as usual. But that is not the real story, which is that even others which
were high and dry stopped as well.
I hypothesize that the ONE generator that kept running was kept as a lone reserve, never hooked up to a SCADA controller. Why did the switch gear disconnect a working generator? That is the type of thing Stuxnet was designed to do. On top of these things, emergency generators arrived on scene within 9 hours, before anything bad happened at all but were not able to provide power because the switch gear would not let them.
The World Nuclear association did a beautiful report about what happened out at Fukushima, and then got co-opted by dark forces. I am keeping the key content of their original report preserved in this one. The World Nuclear Association got taken over, their report destroyed and also expunged from the wayback machine. This Fukushima report you are reading now is all that remains as a solid reference to the original World Nuclear Association report.
Obviously the zionist scammers could not have the truth left intact ANYWHERE. The following screen captures are from the first page of the hacked report, where the World Nuclear Association is now saying no one AT ALL died out at Fukushima, and from another nuclear organization that has not been taken over. A minimum of 3 people died out at Fukushima, documenting even one destroys the World Nuclear Association in it’s current form. The original World Nuclear Association report contained the following points:
The generators never got submerged – you have to connect the dot between them being in a contained area and the tsunami thereby not being able to get to them. Some water got into one of the the turbine buildings where several were located and flooded the lowest point in that building to a depth of 4 feet, which means that even if the generators were on the floor at the lowest point they likely would not have been swamped because they are too big – the water would not get past the footings. Perhaps a one megawatt generator would have swamped; certainly not one of the big diesels, which were, according to this report enough to run 14,000 homes each. In addition to this, there were several generators in a second location that never got flooded at all. One of these generators kept running but was not able to get power into the facility because the switchgear prevented it.
You have to have watched the robot videos, which clearly show the switch gear that malfunctioned after the tsunami never got wet – there was a non tsunami reason for the failure. Also look at the high resolution photos referenced below. There is no switch gear for the diesel generators outside the facility, it is all indoors in areas higher than the water got. Remember that there was no emergency when the off site generators arrived, which means that they could work efficiently to get things up and running. With my experience in this area, Assuming it DID get soaked, a complete replacement of high capacity switch gear should only take an afternoon if done with an emergency attitude. A truck mounted crane or a forklift does all the heavy lifting and the stuff is modular. In every major facility there are spares galore. It is not that hard to make the terminations. A worst case scenario could have been addressed before things went horribly awry, that is, unless a virus did not let the new switch gear activate either. It would take days to conclude a virus was messing things up. You would not expect that. I am sure there is a LOT we never heard about.
That batteries held AT ALL REACTORS, in contrast to the lies in the destroyed report, leaving only a one hour gap in time where there was no power present to run things before adequate off site power drove into the facility on the road all nice and ready to hook up, but was denied to by switch gear which this report says was swamped but that is likely an assumption because swamped switchgear could have been replaced even before the batteries died. The fact that the offsite generators were able to be driven into the facility also proves that other lies told about the earthquake in general – employees leaving only to find cracks in the road so bad they had to walk home; Why? Why lie like this? AT LEAST this report has some modicum of honesty.
You have to look at the chart that shows the thermal output of the reactors 8 hours after the earthquake, which is when the batteries running the electrical cooling pumps died, the output at that time was less than 20 megawatts from each reactor, which means that they would not have had troubles before the off site generators were hooked up to restore power if it was not denied by what I suspect was stuxnet infected switch gear, in fact they would never have had serious troubles at all, beyond having to be vented. The real critical time is in the first 3 hours after shutdown.
Reactor 3 exploded entirely, yet this reactor had the most functional backup systems. At least the original report said the explosion remains “unexplained”. Perhaps those who wrote the report should take a look at this for an answer.
The reactors are stated to be an “early 1960’s design” apparently to mislead people into believing they were outdated even when installed. This was not the case. Their design was an early 60’s concept but in fact a late 60’s design, and since installation takes years, what more could you expect in the early 70’s? The reactors were in fact a very safe design. This report at least states that the facility was very well updated. Identical reactors at TVA owned browns ferry have been certified safe and licensed to operate through the year 2035. These reactors were also converted over to run the Siemens Scada system. The reactors at Fukushima were not garbage. The fastest cars in production still function on a late 1800’s concept.
I hypothesize that the situation at Fukushima is not being properly assessed by facility controllers because STUXNET is STILL giving false readings to the control panels, readings which obviously have to be false because they show containment pressure when confidental leaked photographs prove
beyond a doubt NO CONTAINMENT EXISTS AT ALL AT REACTOR 3, THERE IS NOT EVEN A REACTOR THERE.
I’ve worked in the US nu:clear industry for 30+ years and for 18 years I was a licensed senior reactor operator/control room supervisor on a boiling water reactor (BWR) similar to the Fukushima plant. I helped write the emergency procedure guidelines that are used at US BWRs. There is a great deal of information f lying around that just does not make sense. There just seems to be no detailed technical information getting out to the public on this. At the risk of over simplifying the system,a BWR is like a giant pot of boiling water. Regular light water, not heavy water, goes through the reactor, is heated by the splitting of uranium atoms,turns to steam and spins a turbine-generator to make electricity. The steam is condensed back to water and pumped back into the reactor to continue the cycle.
There are 3 basic barriers to the release of radiation: the metal clad that encases the uranium fuel,the reactor pressure vessel,and the containment. If 2 of these 3 are compromised,and the third is in jeopardy,US plants will advise shelter or evacuat ion of nearby residents.
The reactor operates at a normal pressure of about 1000 psig. During an earthquake of this magnitude, the reactor would be expected to automat ically shut down (called a reactor scram).Control rods are hydraulically driven into the core in less than 7 seconds. Ido not know if this took place but if it did not, we’d probably hear about it because it would be such a big deal. Evenwith rods inserted,the reactor continues to produce heat equivalent to about 3% of its full power level. This is not the same as taking a pot off the stove and letting it cool. There are still some atoms splitting and f ission products decaying that produce heat. This drops off slowly and is why there needs to be layers of redundant cooling with backup power. During such an earthquake,power from outside the plant would not be expected to be available.
Each reactor has 8 separate emergency backup systems, each capable of saving the reactor on it’s own.
Three are designed to function perfectly if all power is lost and even the generators fail. Fukushima did not need any electrical systems operating AT ALL to keep itself from blowing up, when power is lost steam from the reactors is automatically diverted from the generator turbines to two totally separate steam turbines connected to totally separate water pumps needing only reactor steam to power them. Even that backup system has dual redundancy, only one of the two is needed for the job. But the valves which have to activate to re-divert the steam, all 6 valves on a total of 3 fueled reactors failed.
At reactors 1 and 3 these systems worked, but switched off at reactor 1 within an hour and off at reactor 3 after running for more than two days. No one has been able to explain why these systems switched off all by themselves, when they need a powered command to switch off. At reactor 2 they were never allowed to activate. This can only happen if the control system tells them to shut off or stay off, absent intervention from the controller they automatically and seamlessly switch cooling modes to passive rather than electrical.
Some readers may remember that the real issue at Fukushima was malfunctioning valves, and the need to get someone past the radiation to open them. These are the valves that were spoken of. Because Stuxnet kept the readouts normal, no one knew this system did not function until major problems happened as a result flooding the area where the valves are with radiation. This prevented last ditch efforts (running and cutting the wires). One automatic valve jamming and mechanically failing would be a surprise,6 failing can only be sabotage.
In addition to this, another completely independent separately piped backup with an entirely different electronic decision tree which injects borated water at a pre charged 3,500 PSI into the reactor to irrevocably shut down all chain reactions (reactor rebuild required) also simultaneously failed at all 3 fueled reactors. The borated water systems have explosive operated valves so reliable that even one out of 3 failing would be a ten thousand to one possiblity, if that.
Reliability of the borated water systems is technically theoretically assured. All three failing at the same time at Fukushima can only mean sabotage. There are now subsequent reports about boron wearing out and needing to be continuously pumped into the reactor containments to stop the chain reactions.
This does not happen with an intact reactor, and the fact that they need to keep replenishing the boron at reactors 1, 2, and 3 can only mean that the pressure vessels are breached and leaking, with the boron escaping into the groundwater.
High pressure in all of the reactors proves the quake did not damage any of the infrastructure at fukushima because any leaks would have let the pressure go. In addition to this, the seismic readings at Fukushima were 6.07. Fukushima was designed to handle being at the epicenter of an 8.
The media keeps harping about how all the water went away. It only did because these three backup systems were prevented from shutting down all chain reactions, thereby cooling the reactors which caused the water to boil off and never be replaced. High pressures were talked about constantly in the press; This means beyond a doubt that all 6 steam powered backup systems were intact, and all 3 borated water systems were intact also because if they were not the pressure would have escaped through whatever was broken in them. Absent emergency backup control power keeping the virus alive; (control power Magna BSP admitted was there the whole time by mistake when they said their cameras and supporting computers captured the explosions and maintained a data link) the valves which control these systems would have opened when the generators failed and there would have been no disaster.
3 worst case scenarios where all 9 automatic valves across 9 separate emergency backup systems are held shut by the controller when no power should have been present to prevent them from activating can only mean SABOTAGE.
A historical perspective of Fukushima shows the hydrogen blasts were bogus.
Hydrogen blasts could not have damaged Fukushima so badly, this is a media fed lie. If hydrogen gas alone mixed with air could produce blasts strong enough to blow reactor containment buildings to pieces, which are among the strongest structures on earth then hydrogen gas filled bombs would be the prime military option.
In reality, the Three Mile Island incident proved hydrogen ignition in open air after reactor meltdown is likely to only scare employees, while causing no damage at all to the facility, as was the case there. It is extremely important to know the differences between the boiling water reactor design and the design of Chernobyl. At Chernobyl, a hydrogen blast DID cause destruction of the facility, but it was because the reactor design caused hydrogen and oxygen at a perfect ratio to ignite at thousands of PSI inside the reactor pressure vessel. That’s a big difference from hydrogen alone igniting in relatively oxygen starved open air at one atmosphere (14.5 PSI). The difference would be similar to the difference between a small firecracker and a case of dynamite; there were many orders of magnitude lower blast potential at Fukushima.
Just to be absolutely safe after the Three Mile Island incident, many nuclear facilities installed hydrogen hard vent stacks hooked directly up to the relief valves on their reactors, and Fukushima was one of them. This was to prevent a hydrogen buildup in the containment building in the event of a core meltdown, which caused a minor explosion at Three Mile Island. These stacks are the tall white towers you see in the photographs of Fukushima, and they are effective in getting rid of hydrogen buildup, are directly piped, and vent completely outside. “Hard piped” means that the electrical failures would have had nothing to do with the blasts, because a hard vent is exactly that – no fan needed at all because the system is sealed. Even if the hard piping at all 3 fueled Fukushima reactors failed entirely, it should not have been any worse than Three Mile Island which did not have any hard venting to begin with. While hydrogen venting might be a problem if it ignited, it would not mean the death of a facility. It makes no sense that at Fukushima we got a nuclear weapon style mushroom cloud far in excess of the highest yield conventional bomb.
What then, caused the explosions? The containment walls were at their thinnest points in the lowest allowed General Electric design a minimum of 4 feet thick steel reinforced concrete, were likely to be a minimum of 8 feet thick and were totally blown away. All concrete was stripped from the rebar, which was left dangling. One of the blast doors to the inner containments is pictured here.
Reactor 3 vanished entirely, as shown in the diagram on the following page, and reactor four “exploded” despite being completely disassembled and in hard cold shut down. The yellow dome which should be sitting on top of reactor 4 can be clearly seen in the service area of the containment building. This type of destruction is is indicative of hard weaponry in use; a hydrogen air mix will not do that. Reactors are not made out of tinfoil. There was no potential for an explosion at reactor 4 at all, it had been defueled. SO WHAT, PRAY TELL, BLEW IT APART?
That’s the dirty question no one is asking – how did that happen? Subsequent story lines try to explain reactor 4’s destruction away by saying that hydrogen back fed into reactor 4 from reactor 3 via the hard vent pipe, but with reactor 3 obviously blown to smithereens in the diagram on the following page, that would be flatly impossible.
The crane rails provide a fixed reference that would remain the same despite Japanese enhancements to the facility japan had these built stronger than specs, so the concrete went higher than the standard diagram. From the position of the crane rails, we can determine that the top portion of the reactor at unit 3 is completely gone.
This reality is corroborated by other photos included in the
original Fukushima report.
Crane rails have to be here,
which means a lot of the top
of this structure is gone.
Top of reactor
The entire separator pool is blown away-
Reactor 3 is beyond all doubt completely gone. That cannot happen by accident. The only way you can completely vanish a reactor is with a nuclear weapon,there is simply nothing in any arsenal outside of a nuke that could do it. Ibelieve Magna BSP had a nuclear weapon hidden in one of their unrealistically GIANT cameras, which were installed inside the reactor 3 containment.
The two towers in the foreground were installed after three mile island,where a core meltdown caused hydrogen venting and a subsequent hydrogen burn. These towers were installed at many nuclear facilities to vent hydrogen and prevent explosions after a core meltdown. This makes the hydrogen story at Fukushima
very implausible and inconsistent with Three Mile Island where no explosive damages were incurred.
At Fukushima we got a mushroom cloud. Figure the odds. Since a reactor is completely incapable of going supercritical even in full meltdown, and hydrogen caused no damage to another facility even when ignited after a meltdown, what could cause a mushroom cloud?
To give you an idea of how big the reactors at Fukushima were, take a look at the photo to the left. It’s the top of the same make and model at Fukushima’s American twin, TVA owned Brown’s Ferry, and it is only the top. The yellow dome sits above this, and is even bigger. (here the yellow dome has been removed for refueling). over 150 feet of reactor sits below that cap. Hydrogen will not vaporize that, which appears to be what happened to #3, only a nuclear weapon would. The reactors did not explode, something placed in their vicinity did.
Magna BSP had access to the reactors at this facility. They were based in Dimona, which is a military base that manufactures nuclear weapons. Stuxnet was made in their yard. They are stated to be a military company, and a key piece of their equipment was the same size, shape, weight, and appearance of a gun type nuclear weapon.
There is extremely strong evidence that Dimona based Magna BSP placed nuclear weapons at the exploded or vanished reactors at Fukushima, possibly hidden inside their unbelievably GIANT stereoscopic cameras. One of these cameras is verified to have been installed inside the inner containment of Fukushima reactor 3 under the cover of a security contract in the month prior to the disaster. These cameras are identical in size and appearance to gun type nuclear weapons.
Since previous hydrogen explosions at boiling water reactors have never caused any sort of damage to equipment or buildings, even during complete meltdowns, it begs the question how on earth one at reactor 3 produced a mushroom cloud. Three Mile Island sits in the evidence pool against what we have been told about Fukushima. History does matter.
One problem with the reporting in the mainstream media is that it failed to convey just how massive and strong the containment structures really were, as shown in the photos at the beginning of this report, as well as how huge the reactors really were, as shown in the following photo.
narwhal8915's Blog 